Intelligent Process Automation in ERP Back-Office — 65% Fewer Manual Touches for a Logistics Operator
Logistics
Visual-AI-Labs automated order entry, invoice matching and exception handling inside an existing ERP in two 30-day cycles, cutting manual back-office touches by 65%.
- −65% — Manual back-office touches
- 89% — Invoice-to-order match rate (automated)
- 6 min → 45 sec — Order entry time
- −70% within 8 weeks — Exception backlog
The problem
The operator ran a well-established ERP for freight orders, billing and depot inventory, but the back-office team still re-keyed order details from customer emails and PDFs, manually matched carrier invoices against orders, and chased exceptions (mismatched weights, missing PODs, rate discrepancies) across spreadsheets. The ERP itself worked fine — the surrounding manual work did not scale with volume, and a full ERP replacement was neither wanted nor necessary.
What Visual-AI-Labs built
Visual-AI-Labs layered an intelligent process automation (IPA) system on top of the existing ERP across two 30-day cycles, rather than replacing it. Cycle 1 shipped document extraction (order emails, rate confirmations, PODs, carrier invoices) writing directly into the ERP via its API, plus automated invoice-to-order matching with confidence scoring. Cycle 2 added an exception-handling queue that groups mismatches by root cause, suggests a resolution, and routes anything ambiguous to the right back-office specialist — instead of a shared, un-triaged spreadsheet.
- Document extraction (email, PDF, scanned POD) writing directly into the existing ERP via API
- Automated invoice-to-order matching with per-match confidence scoring
- Exception queue grouped by root cause with a suggested resolution
- No ERP replacement — the automation layer sits alongside the current system
- Weekly ops dashboard: touches automated, exception volume, matching accuracy
Results
Manual back-office touches fell 65% within the first two months post-launch. 89% of carrier invoices are now matched to their orders automatically, up from a mostly manual process. Order entry time dropped from roughly 6 minutes to 45 seconds per order, and the exception backlog — previously growing week over week — was cut by 70% within 8 weeks as the routing and root-cause grouping took hold.
Tech & process
Visual-AI-Labs ran two successive 30-day cycles with weekly demos against a shadow environment before any write path went live. The extraction and matching logic runs independently of the ERP’s core, calling its existing API — so the operator keeps full control of its system of record while gaining an automation layer that can be extended (or unplugged) without disrupting daily operations.
Discuss a similar project with Visual-AI-Labs →
FAQ
Did the operator have to replace or upgrade its ERP?
No. The automation layer integrates through the ERP’s existing API and does not require an ERP migration or version upgrade.
How does the system decide what to automate vs. escalate?
Every extraction and match ships with a confidence score. Below a configurable threshold, the item is routed to a human specialist instead of being auto-processed.
What document types are handled?
Order emails, rate confirmations, proof-of-delivery documents and carrier invoices — in PDF, scanned image and plain-text email form.
How long until measurable results appeared?
The first cycle (document extraction and matching) showed measurable time savings within 3 weeks of go-live; the second cycle compounded the effect on exceptions.
Is this specific to logistics, or would it work for manufacturing back-offices?
The same pattern applies to manufacturing ERP back-offices with similar document-heavy workflows (purchase orders, supplier invoices, goods-receipt matching).
What happens to the exception spreadsheet?
It is retired. Exceptions move into a structured queue with root-cause grouping, visible to the whole back-office team instead of living in one person’s inbox.
How is data security handled given sensitive commercial rates?
Processing stays EU-hosted and scoped to the operator’s own ERP tenant; Visual-AI-Labs does not pool data across clients.